Adds PHASE6D_ROOT_FOUNDATIONS.md (the phase's own record: the generic-scenario-engine finding, the tested container-runtime decision, what was authored, the bugs found and fixed, and honest test/regression/rehearsal results) and ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_PILOT_READINESS.md (module-by-module READY/DEFERRED classification for ROOT 01-04 against the unchanged Phase 6C readiness standard — ROOT 01 READY, ROOT 02-04 DEFERRED by design). Adds ROOT_PROGRAM_DURATION_MODEL.md — real per-course instructional-hour totals computed from actual estimated_duration_minutes values (2,931 minutes / 48.9 hours across all authored content), not invented, with an explicit note on why instructor-led timing isn't a separate summable field yet. Updates ROOT_PROGRAM_ARCHITECTURE.md (ROOT 01's new READY status and the real 01-04 prerequisite chain), ROOT_PILOT_CURRICULUM.md (ROOT 01 added to the pilot, module-level detail), and ROOT_CURRICULUM_COVERAGE_MATRIX.md (updated module/scenario totals) to reflect what Phase 6D actually built, without restating Phase 6C's own Kubernetes-scenario tables. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
9.9 KiB
ROOT_ Program Architecture
Phase 6A §2 — the canonical course architecture for root_ (Linux → systems → containers →
Kubernetes → DevOps/platform engineering, ages ~15-18+/college/adult per the youth ladder — see
docs/PHASE6A_ROOT_COURSE_FOUNDATION.md §1). This document is the design; the actual seed data
lives in platform/api/migrations/022_course_content.sql, generated to match this exactly.
All 13 rows below are courses under the ONE existing program, root-kubernetes-foundations
(programs table, unchanged — see §"why one program, not thirteen" below). Every status claim
here is grounded in docs/ROOT_CURRICULUM_INVENTORY.md, not aspirational.
Updated for Phase 6B (platform/api/migrations/023_phase6b_curriculum.sql,
docs/PHASE6B_ROOT_CURRICULUM_EXPANSION.md): ROOT 08 and 09 moved from PLANNED to PARTIAL, and
6 courses gained new teaching modules — the module-level detail and evidence for every new
placement lives in docs/ROOT_CURRICULUM_COVERAGE_MATRIX.md, not duplicated here.
Updated for Phase 6D (platform/api/migrations/025_phase6d_root_foundations_root01.sql,
docs/PHASE6D_ROOT_FOUNDATIONS.md): ROOT 01 fully authored and moved to READY — see
docs/ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_ARCHITECTURE.md for its module-level design and
docs/ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_LAB_STRATEGY.md for why no new activity type was needed. ROOT 02-04
remain PLANNED (architecture designed, content not yet authored) but now carry a real
prerequisite chain (01→02→03→04→05) enforced server-side.
Course sequence
| # | Course | Status | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computing & Linux Foundations | READY | Phase 6D: 6 modules, real Linux/shell scenarios using the existing generic scenario engine, a wired assessment — see docs/PHASE6D_ROOT_FOUNDATIONS.md. |
| 2 | Linux Administration & Networking | PLANNED | Architecture designed (docs/ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_ARCHITECTURE.md); content not yet authored. Real prerequisite: ROOT 01 complete. |
| 3 | Git & Collaborative Development | PLANNED | Architecture designed; content not yet authored. Real prerequisite: ROOT 02 complete. |
| 4 | Containers & Docker | PLANNED | Architecture designed; the nested-Docker-Engine platform extension it needs was built and verified this phase (docs/ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_LAB_STRATEGY.md §3), course content not yet authored. Real prerequisite: ROOT 03 complete. |
| 5 | Kubernetes Foundations | PARTIAL | Phase 6B added a READY front-door module (root-05-m00-kubernetes-mental-model — full lesson/demo/knowledge-check/guided-exercise/lab/reflection) sequenced before the existing 20-scenario bare-lab bank (root-05-m01), which now sits behind it. |
| 6 | Kubernetes Application Workloads | PARTIAL | Phase 6B added a READY root-06-m02-deployments-scaling-updates and a PARTIAL root-06-m03-jobs-cronjobs-daemonsets, both in front of the existing bare-lab bank. |
| 7 | Kubernetes Networking & Configuration | PARTIAL | Phase 6B added a READY root-07-m03-services-and-service-discovery and a PARTIAL root-07-m04-ingress-networkpolicy-foundations. The existing configuration bank (root-07-m02) still has no authored teaching content — an honest, documented gap. |
| 8 | Kubernetes Storage & Scheduling | PARTIAL | Phase 6B wired the real scenario content the inventory identified (PV/PVC, StorageClass, taints/tolerations, PDB, quotas/limits) into two new PARTIAL modules — moved off PLANNED for the first time. |
| 9 | Kubernetes Security | PARTIAL | Phase 6B built the 22-scenario CKS-style bank into four modules (Security Model & SecurityContext — READY; ServiceAccounts & RBAC, Network & Supply Chain Security, Cluster Hardening & Runtime — all PARTIAL), classifying scenarios CORE/GUIDED/INDEPENDENT/ADVANCED/ASSESSMENT-BANK rather than exposing them as 22 disconnected tasks — moved off PLANNED. |
| 10 | Kubernetes Troubleshooting & Observability | PARTIAL | The Phase 6A gold-standard module (READY, unmodified) plus a new PARTIAL root-10-m03-troubleshooting-framework (the generalized Observe/Evidence/Hypothesis/Test/Repair/Validate/Prevent framework) and the existing bare-lab bank, now sequenced last. |
| 11 | DevOps & Platform Engineering Foundations | PLANNED | No CI/CD/IaC/GitOps scenario content exists anywhere in this repository — unchanged, out of Phase 6B's authoring scope. |
| 12 | RootNode Real Ops | PARTIAL | Phase 6B added an incident-response framing lesson and a post-incident reflection wrapping the existing 4-scenario module — the incidents themselves are unchanged, still deliberately un-guided. |
| 13 | ROOT Capstone — Operate and Recover a Production-Like Environment | PARTIAL | Phase 6B added a READY Capstone Readiness module (orientation, no answers) sequenced before the existing capstone assessment module — see docs/ROOT_CAPSTONE_READINESS.md. |
No course is marked READY at the course level in Phase 6A — that's honest: a course only earns READY once every module in it has real teaching content, and Phase 6A deliberately built exactly one complete module (the gold standard) as the authoring template, not a finished curriculum.
Prerequisite chain
01 Linux Foundations → 02 Linux Admin/Networking → 03 Git → 04 Containers/Docker
│
▼
05 Kubernetes Foundations
│
▼
06 Application Workloads
│ │
┌─────────────────────┤ │
▼ ▼ ▼
07 Networking/Config 09 Security 10 Troubleshooting
│ │ │
▼ │ ▼
08 Storage/Scheduling │ 11 DevOps/Platform
▼
12 RootNode Real Ops
│
▼
CAPSTONE — Operate & Recover
Updated for Phase 6D: 01→02→03→04→05 is now a real, server-side prerequisite chain
(courses.prerequisites). Since ROOT 01 is now real content and 02-04 remain PLANNED, ROOT 02
is the first course this chain actually locks (behind ROOT 01); 03/04/05 stay vacuously
satisfied until their own prerequisite course is authored — see
docs/COURSE_CONTENT_MODEL.md's "prerequisite/locking rule" for why a PLANNED/content-free
prerequisite never actually blocks anything, and docs/PHASE6D_ROOT_FOUNDATIONS.md for the live
verification of this behavior on both a completed and a fresh student.
Deviations from the spec's suggested sequence, and why
The authorization's suggested sequence listed Security (09) after Storage/Scheduling (08) and before Troubleshooting (10). This document keeps that numbering for continuity, but the prerequisite graph branches 09 and 10 both directly off 06 (Application Workloads) rather than chaining 08→09→10 linearly — the existing content doesn't actually build 09 on top of 08's concepts (RBAC/PSA/network-policy security content is orthogonal to PV/PVC/scheduling content), so a straight linear chain would impose a false dependency. This is exactly the case the authorization's "if existing content suggests a better grouping, document the reasoning" line anticipated.
Real Ops and Capstone placement
Real Ops (12) sits after Troubleshooting (10), matching the existing curriculum's own stage
order (rootnode-path.json's real-ops stage already comes after troubleshooting) — Real Ops
scenarios assume the diagnostic skills Troubleshooting teaches. The Capstone sits after Real Ops
alone, not after every course, because that's what the existing rootnode-capstone assessment
definition's own unlock_rule already requires (all 6 content stages of rootnode-path.json
complete — which necessarily includes 05-06-07-10-12's underlying scenarios, plus networking/
configuration). 08, 09, and 11 are not currently gating the capstone, because their scenario
content isn't part of rootnode-path.json's stage list at all yet — see
docs/COURSE_CONTENT_MODEL.md for how course-level completion is computed independently of that
assessment-engine unlock_rule (the two systems currently agree by construction, not by a shared
implementation).
Why one program, not thirteen
programs (Phase 5B) models the commercial/academic unit a student enrolls in. root_ is
described by this authorization as one continuous ladder — "Linux → systems → containers →
Kubernetes → DevOps/platform engineering" — not thirteen separate purchases. Attaching all 13
courses to the single existing root-kubernetes-foundations program means:
- Zero changes to the
programstable, enrollment model, or entitlement logic — an enrolled student automatically has structured access to the whole ladder as it's built out. - No renaming/redefinition of the existing program (which would risk a real, if cosmetic, break for anyone already enrolled) — see Phase 6A's explicit "do not redesign working systems" constraint.
If a future phase needs root_ split into separately-purchasable programs (e.g. "Kubernetes
Foundations" sold standalone from "DevOps"), that's a programs-table decision to make
deliberately later, informed by real pricing/business requirements — not something to guess at
here.