Adds all 8 ROOT 04 modules (why containers exist, images & containers, Docker CLI, container networking, container storage, Dockerfile & image build, Docker Compose, containers → Kubernetes) — 43 activities, using the nested Docker Engine Phase 6D built and tested. Modules 1, 2, and 8 are conceptual (no lab by design) — the honest bridge module (M8) explicitly names what Kubernetes adds beyond what this course already taught, without re-teaching Kubernetes itself. Adds 5 new hands-on Docker scenarios plus 2 MCQs, all against the real nested Docker Engine: docker-cli-basics (run/exec/inspect a real container), docker-container-networking (a genuine "works internally, unreachable from host" port-publishing failure, diagnosed and fixed by recreating the container with the correct `-p` flag), docker-container-storage (a real destroy/recreate cycle proving named-volume persistence, not just described), docker-build-image (a real Dockerfile, a real build, a real custom image run), and docker-compose-multiservice (a real two-service Compose application with a real published port). All tested end-to-end via the real scenario-validation API, including negative tests. Wires rootnode-containers-assessment (2 required + 4 random-draw scenarios) using the existing Phase 3B assessment engine. This completes the entire ROOT_ Foundations sequence (ROOT 01-04) — see docs/PHASE6E_ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_COMPLETION.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
66 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# Docker Compose
|
|
|
|
## Real applications are rarely just one container
|
|
|
|
A web app usually needs a database, maybe a cache, maybe a background worker — several
|
|
containers that need to be created, networked together, and started in a sensible order. Doing
|
|
this manually with individual `docker run` commands works, but gets tedious and error-prone fast,
|
|
especially remembering the exact flags every time.
|
|
|
|
## One file, the whole application
|
|
|
|
**Docker Compose** describes an entire multi-container application in one YAML file:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
services:
|
|
web:
|
|
image: nginx:alpine
|
|
ports:
|
|
- "8080:80"
|
|
depends_on:
|
|
- api
|
|
api:
|
|
image: my-api:1
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- **`services`** — each entry is one container, using the exact same concepts (image, ports,
|
|
etc.) you already know from plain `docker run`.
|
|
- **`depends_on`** — controls STARTUP order (api starts before web) — note this ensures order,
|
|
not that the dependency is fully READY yet, a subtlety real applications often need extra
|
|
handling for.
|
|
- **Networking is automatic** — Compose creates a shared network for all services in the file by
|
|
default, so `web` can reach `api` by name immediately, no manual `docker network create`
|
|
needed.
|
|
|
|
## The commands
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
docker compose up -d # start every service defined in the file, in the background
|
|
docker compose ps # see the status of every service
|
|
docker compose logs # see logs from every service, or docker compose logs <service>
|
|
docker compose down # stop and remove everything Compose created
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Compose doesn't replace anything you've learned — it automates it
|
|
|
|
Every Compose service maps directly onto a `docker run` command you could write by hand; Compose
|
|
just describes the whole set declaratively in one file instead of remembering and re-typing
|
|
several long commands correctly, every time, in the right order.
|
|
|
|
## Instructor Notes
|
|
|
|
**Lesson goal:** Frame Compose as automation of already-understood concepts, not new magic —
|
|
students should be able to mentally translate a `services:` block back into individual
|
|
`docker run` commands.
|
|
|
|
**Approximate timing:** 15 minutes read; 10 minutes live.
|
|
|
|
**Common misconception to watch for:** treating `depends_on` as "waits until fully healthy" —
|
|
it only controls START order, not readiness; worth flagging as a real, common source of race
|
|
conditions in actual production Compose files.
|
|
|
|
**Discussion question:** "Why might describing your application declaratively in one file be
|
|
better than a shell script that runs several `docker run` commands in sequence?" (Good answer:
|
|
reviewable, versionable, and Compose itself understands the relationships between services,
|
|
rather than just blindly executing a sequence.)
|