Files
rootnode-academy/content/root/root-03-git-collaborative-development/m04-branching-and-merging/04-guided-exercise-choosing-a-resolution.md
T
ced4568andClaude Sonnet 5 e68b6f445a feat(root03): author Git & Collaborative Development
Adds all 6 ROOT 03 modules (why version control exists, the Git mental model, everyday Git,
branching & merging, remote repositories, engineering Git workflow) — 31 activities. Uses only
real LOCAL Git repositories throughout — no Gitea account, no network access, and no
RootNode-canonical-repo credential is ever needed or exposed in a student Lab
(docs/ROOT_FOUNDATIONS_LAB_STRATEGY.md §4). Modules 1, 2, and 6 are conceptual bookends with no
lab, matching the flexible readiness standard already used in ROOT 01/02.

Adds 3 new hands-on Git scenarios plus 2 MCQs: git-everyday-basics (init/add/commit, validated
by inspecting real `git log`/`git show` state, not just command output strings — Step 6's
explicit requirement), git-branching-and-merge (a REAL merge conflict caused on purpose by two
branches editing the same line, resolved by the student, validated by confirming the conflict
markers are gone and a real two-parent merge commit exists), and git-remote-clone-push (a real
local bare repository standing in for a remote — clone/commit/push validated by inspecting the
REMOTE side directly, not just the student's own clone). All tested end-to-end via the real
scenario-validation API, including negative tests.

Wires rootnode-git-fundamentals-assessment (2 required + 3 random-draw scenarios) using the
existing Phase 3B assessment engine.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-26 17:08:00 -05:00

37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Guided Exercise: Decide the Resolution Before You Touch the File
This is a paper exercise — commit to a decision before resolving anything in the Lab.
## Your task
A merge conflict shows:
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
timeout_seconds = 30
=======
timeout_seconds = 120
>>>>>>> feature
```
You know `main`'s value (30) was set deliberately for production safety, but `feature`'s value
(120) was added while debugging a slow endpoint that genuinely needs more time. Write out: what
final content would you put in the file, and why is that the RIGHT resolution (not just "pick
one side")?
## A worked shape to check yourself against
A well-reasoned resolution here is neither side alone: something like keeping `30` as the
DEFAULT but adding a comment or a separate, more specific setting for the slow endpoint
specifically — the point is that conflict resolution sometimes means genuinely combining intent
from both sides, not mechanically picking `HEAD` or the incoming branch. There's no single
"correct" file content — the value is in justifying whichever choice you make with real
reasoning, not defaulting to whichever side happens to be `HEAD`.
## Instructor Notes
**Facilitation:** The point of this exercise is resisting "just pick a side" as a reflex —
some conflicts genuinely require combining or renegotiating intent, not mechanical selection.
**Approximate timing:** 8-10 minutes live discussion; 5 minutes self-paced.