Files
rootnode-academy/scenarios/data/jobs-cronjobs-mcq.json
T
ced4568andClaude Sonnet 5 60fbf0c385 feat(curriculum): add RootNode learning path, student roster, and scenario isolation metadata
Pre-Phase-1 platform work, approved and tested earlier but not yet committed:

- Terminal banner: "RootNode Academy Lab — node: k8s-lab", upstream KubeKosh
  attribution left untouched in footer/README/LICENSE.
- RootNode curriculum mode: scenarios/rootnode-path.json (Foundation -> Workloads
  -> Networking -> Configuration -> Troubleshooting -> Real Ops -> Capstone),
  built from existing scenario content grouped by category, no new scenarios
  invented. New GET /api/curriculum/path endpoint.
- Student roster + per-student progress: instructor-roster, pick-your-name login
  (no password), students/environments-adjacent progress table migrated to a
  (student_id, scenario_id) composite key so practice progress and exam sessions
  are isolated per student instead of one global bucket. New /api/roster,
  /api/login endpoints.
- scenarios/data/*.json: added isolation_type metadata (shared_namespace vs
  ephemeral_cluster) from an audit of which scenarios execute cluster-scoped or
  node-level commands. This was Tier-1-isolation groundwork that got superseded
  same-day by the full-ephemeral-per-student architecture (see
  docs/LAB_ARCHITECTURE.md) — the field is kept as descriptive metadata only,
  per the note now in scenarios/SCHEMA.md. Not wasted: it's an accurate audit of
  which scenarios touch cluster-scoped resources, useful independent of isolation
  model.
- .gitignore added (node_modules/, frontend/dist/, *.db, /data/, .env) — none
  existed before; without it, npm installs during testing would have landed in
  a commit.

Known limitation still open: no frontend UI for any of this yet (login screen,
roster-add form, curriculum view) — API-only. No auth on the roster-add endpoint.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-18 01:21:16 -05:00

41 lines
1.7 KiB
JSON

{
"id": "jobs-cronjobs-mcq",
"title": "Jobs vs CronJobs",
"category": "Workloads",
"isolation_type": "shared_namespace",
"difficulty": "Easy",
"type": "mcq",
"weight": 3,
"description": "## Jobs vs CronJobs\n\nA data-processing team needs to run a database backup script **every night at midnight**. Which Kubernetes resource should they use, and why?",
"options": [
{
"id": "a",
"text": "A `Job` — because Jobs run a task until it completes successfully, including on a nightly schedule"
},
{
"id": "b",
"text": "A `CronJob` — because it creates Jobs on a time-based schedule (cron syntax) and is designed for recurring tasks"
},
{
"id": "c",
"text": "A `Deployment` with `restartPolicy: OnFailure` — deployments keep tasks running on schedule"
},
{
"id": "d",
"text": "A `DaemonSet` — because it ensures exactly one backup process per node nightly"
}
],
"correct_option": "b",
"explanation": "A **CronJob** is the right resource for recurring scheduled tasks. It uses standard cron syntax (e.g. `0 0 * * *` for midnight daily) and creates a new `Job` object at each scheduled time. A plain `Job` runs once to completion — you would need external scheduling to run it nightly. Deployments are for long-running services, and DaemonSets run pods on every node.",
"hints": [
{
"title": "CronJob syntax",
"body": "CronJobs use standard cron format: `minute hour day-of-month month day-of-week`. For midnight daily: `0 0 * * *`.",
"command": "kubectl explain cronjob.spec.schedule"
}
],
"setup_commands": [],
"default_namespace": "default",
"teardown_commands": []
}