Pre-Phase-1 platform work, approved and tested earlier but not yet committed: - Terminal banner: "RootNode Academy Lab — node: k8s-lab", upstream KubeKosh attribution left untouched in footer/README/LICENSE. - RootNode curriculum mode: scenarios/rootnode-path.json (Foundation -> Workloads -> Networking -> Configuration -> Troubleshooting -> Real Ops -> Capstone), built from existing scenario content grouped by category, no new scenarios invented. New GET /api/curriculum/path endpoint. - Student roster + per-student progress: instructor-roster, pick-your-name login (no password), students/environments-adjacent progress table migrated to a (student_id, scenario_id) composite key so practice progress and exam sessions are isolated per student instead of one global bucket. New /api/roster, /api/login endpoints. - scenarios/data/*.json: added isolation_type metadata (shared_namespace vs ephemeral_cluster) from an audit of which scenarios execute cluster-scoped or node-level commands. This was Tier-1-isolation groundwork that got superseded same-day by the full-ephemeral-per-student architecture (see docs/LAB_ARCHITECTURE.md) — the field is kept as descriptive metadata only, per the note now in scenarios/SCHEMA.md. Not wasted: it's an accurate audit of which scenarios touch cluster-scoped resources, useful independent of isolation model. - .gitignore added (node_modules/, frontend/dist/, *.db, /data/, .env) — none existed before; without it, npm installs during testing would have landed in a commit. Known limitation still open: no frontend UI for any of this yet (login screen, roster-add form, curriculum view) — API-only. No auth on the roster-add endpoint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
41 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
41 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"id": "services-mcq",
|
|
"title": "Kubernetes Service Types",
|
|
"category": "Networking",
|
|
"isolation_type": "shared_namespace",
|
|
"difficulty": "Easy",
|
|
"type": "mcq",
|
|
"weight": 4,
|
|
"description": "## Choose the Right Service Type\n\nYou have a microservice running inside the cluster that needs to be reachable **from the internet** (external traffic). The cluster is hosted on a cloud provider (AWS/GCP/Azure).\n\nWhich **Service type** should you use?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a",
|
|
"text": "ClusterIP — the default service type, only reachable within the cluster"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "b",
|
|
"text": "NodePort — opens a port on every node, accessible from outside if the node IP is reachable"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "c",
|
|
"text": "LoadBalancer — provisions a cloud load balancer and assigns an external IP automatically"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "d",
|
|
"text": "ExternalName — maps the service to a DNS name, not suitable for external ingress"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"correct_option": "c",
|
|
"explanation": "`LoadBalancer` is the right choice for production external traffic on cloud-hosted clusters. It provisions a cloud provider load balancer (like an AWS ALB or GCP L4 LB) and assigns an external IP. `NodePort` works in theory but requires knowing node IPs and is not production-grade. `ClusterIP` is internal-only. `ExternalName` is for mapping services to external DNS names.",
|
|
"hints": [
|
|
{
|
|
"title": "Recall Service types",
|
|
"body": "There are 4 service types: ClusterIP (internal), NodePort (node-level), LoadBalancer (cloud LB), ExternalName (DNS alias). Each builds on the previous in terms of exposure level.",
|
|
"command": "kubectl explain service.spec.type"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"setup_commands": [],
|
|
"default_namespace": "default",
|
|
"teardown_commands": []
|
|
}
|