root-06-m02-deployments-scaling-updates — a new, full gold-standard- pattern module: why Deployments/ReplicaSets exist, how a rolling update actually progresses, and what rollback restores. Lesson, demonstration (a healthy rollout vs. one stalled on ImagePullBackOff), knowledge check, guided exercise (planning a safe rollout strategy), real Labs (rolling-update-task, deployment-rollback), and a reflection. root-06-m03-jobs-cronjobs-daemonsets — a new PARTIAL module: Jobs, CronJobs, and DaemonSets as distinct workload shapes from a Deployment's always-on model. Lesson + knowledge check + real Labs (job-task, cronjob-task). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
3.9 KiB
Jobs, CronJobs, and DaemonSets: The Other Workload Shapes
Everything in the previous module assumed a long-running application that should always have N replicas up. Not every workload looks like that. Kubernetes has three other primitives for genuinely different shapes of work — using a Deployment for any of these would be the wrong tool, not just a less elegant one.
Job: run to completion, exactly once (or a fixed number of times)
A Job creates one or more Pods and considers itself done when they exit successfully — it does NOT restart a Pod that exits with success, and it DOES retry one that fails, up to a configured limit. This is fundamentally different from a Deployment, which expects its Pods to run forever and treats any exit as something to replace.
Use a Job for: a database migration, a batch data-processing task, a one-off cleanup script — anything with a defined "finished" state.
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: Job
metadata:
name: migrate-db
spec:
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: migrate
image: myapp:latest
command: ["./migrate.sh"]
restartPolicy: Never
backoffLimit: 3
CronJob: a Job, on a schedule
A CronJob doesn't run Pods itself — it creates a new Job on a cron schedule (schedule: "0 2 * * *" for "every day at 2am"), and that Job behaves exactly as described above. Use a
CronJob for anything that should run periodically and finish: nightly backups, scheduled
reports, periodic cleanup.
A CronJob that reliably fails to complete (an image that always crashes, for example) will keep creating new Jobs on schedule, each failing the same way — this is a real, common way to silently exhaust cluster resources (job/pod history accumulating) if nobody's watching.
DaemonSet: exactly one Pod per node, automatically
A DaemonSet doesn't declare a replica count at all — it ensures exactly one matching Pod runs on every node in the cluster (or every node matching a selector), and automatically adds a Pod when a new node joins. Use a DaemonSet for per-node infrastructure: a log-shipping agent, a node-level monitoring exporter, a network plugin component — things that fundamentally need to exist once per machine, not "N copies somewhere."
The decision in one pass
| You need... | Use |
|---|---|
| Always-on, N identical copies, restarted forever | Deployment |
| Run once (or a few times) until it finishes successfully | Job |
| The above, but on a recurring schedule | CronJob |
| Exactly one copy on every node | DaemonSet |
Instructor Notes
Approximate timing: 15 minutes read; 10 minutes live.
Demo plan (if extending this PARTIAL module later): live-create a Job with a command that
deliberately fails once then succeeds (backoffLimit: 2), and watch kubectl get pods show
the failed attempt alongside the eventual successful one — makes the retry-until-backoffLimit
behavior concrete.
Likely misconceptions to watch for:
- Students often assume a Job that finishes successfully gets cleaned up automatically. It
doesn't by default — the completed Pod/Job objects remain until manually deleted or a
ttlSecondsAfterFinishedis configured (not covered here, worth a one-line mention if asked). - "DaemonSet" is sometimes confused with "one Pod, cluster-wide" (singular). It's the opposite — one Pod PER NODE, which can be many Pods total in a multi-node cluster.
Discussion question: "Why doesn't a Deployment support 'run once and be done'?" (Answer: a Deployment's whole contract is maintaining a standing replica count forever — repurposing it for one-shot work would fight that contract rather than use a primitive designed for it.)
Optional extension: ask what would go wrong if a CronJob's schedule ran more often than a
single Job execution takes to complete (answer: overlapping Job runs, unless
concurrencyPolicy is set to Forbid or Replace — a real gotcha worth naming even without
building a full lab around it).