Pre-Phase-1 platform work, approved and tested earlier but not yet committed: - Terminal banner: "RootNode Academy Lab — node: k8s-lab", upstream KubeKosh attribution left untouched in footer/README/LICENSE. - RootNode curriculum mode: scenarios/rootnode-path.json (Foundation -> Workloads -> Networking -> Configuration -> Troubleshooting -> Real Ops -> Capstone), built from existing scenario content grouped by category, no new scenarios invented. New GET /api/curriculum/path endpoint. - Student roster + per-student progress: instructor-roster, pick-your-name login (no password), students/environments-adjacent progress table migrated to a (student_id, scenario_id) composite key so practice progress and exam sessions are isolated per student instead of one global bucket. New /api/roster, /api/login endpoints. - scenarios/data/*.json: added isolation_type metadata (shared_namespace vs ephemeral_cluster) from an audit of which scenarios execute cluster-scoped or node-level commands. This was Tier-1-isolation groundwork that got superseded same-day by the full-ephemeral-per-student architecture (see docs/LAB_ARCHITECTURE.md) — the field is kept as descriptive metadata only, per the note now in scenarios/SCHEMA.md. Not wasted: it's an accurate audit of which scenarios touch cluster-scoped resources, useful independent of isolation model. - .gitignore added (node_modules/, frontend/dist/, *.db, /data/, .env) — none existed before; without it, npm installs during testing would have landed in a commit. Known limitation still open: no frontend UI for any of this yet (login screen, roster-add form, curriculum view) — API-only. No auth on the roster-add endpoint. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
35 lines
1.0 KiB
JSON
35 lines
1.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"id": "cks-mcq-psp-replacement",
|
|
"title": "Pod Security Evolution",
|
|
"category": "Cluster Security",
|
|
"isolation_type": "shared_namespace",
|
|
"difficulty": "Easy",
|
|
"type": "mcq",
|
|
"weight": 2,
|
|
"description": "PodSecurityPolicies (PSP) were completely removed from Kubernetes in version 1.25. What is the built-in native replacement that enforces Pod Security Standards at the namespace level?",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "a",
|
|
"text": "NetworkPolicies"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "b",
|
|
"text": "OPA Gatekeeper"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "c",
|
|
"text": "Pod Security Admission (PSA)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": "d",
|
|
"text": "AppArmor Profiles"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"correct_option": "c",
|
|
"explanation": "Pod Security Admission (PSA) is the built-in admission controller that evaluates Pods against the predefined Pod Security Standards (Privileged, Baseline, and Restricted) based on namespace labels.",
|
|
"hints": [],
|
|
"setup_commands": [],
|
|
"default_namespace": "default",
|
|
"teardown_commands": []
|
|
}
|