# Phase 4.1 two-host routing simulation — docs/PHASE4_1_PREPRODUCTION_HARDENING.md §6.
#
# Proves the ONE thing that matters using REAL Docker network isolation, not mocks: a Gateway
# container with no route to a Lab container's bridge network genuinely cannot reach it, and
# can only reach it through the Lab Host Router.
#
# What's genuinely simulated (real Docker networking facts, not faked):
#   - `gateway` is attached ONLY to `sim-platform-net`. It has no network_mode: host, no
#     attachment to any per-Lab bridge network (rootnode-lab-net-<id>, created dynamically by
#     the Provisioner) — its network namespace simply has no route to one. This is the same
#     kind of isolation two separate Proxmox VMs would have, achieved here with two Docker
#     networks on one daemon instead of two physical hosts.
#   - `lab-router` runs with network_mode: host — exactly like `egress-proxy` already does in
#     docker-compose.dev.yml (see that file's comment on why: a host-networked process can
#     reach every bridge network's containers via the host's own routing table, which is
#     exactly what a real Lab Host Router process running directly on rn-lab-host-01 needs).
#     It's also reachable FROM `sim-platform-net` via that network's own gateway IP — the same
#     mechanism the egress-proxy already relies on for the reverse direction.
#   - `provisioner`/`api`/`postgres` stay host-networked, unchanged from docker-compose.dev.yml
#     — this phase's new proof target is the Gateway-to-Lab DATA plane, not the CONTROL plane
#     (already proven with a real mTLS handshake in Phase 4). Keeping them as-is is a
#     deliberate scope choice, not an oversight — see the README in this directory.
#
# What this does NOT prove (needs the real hardware — docs/PRODUCTION_VALIDATION_CHECKLIST.md):
# real cross-VM network latency/MTU, the actual Hetzner/Proxmox firewall enforcement, or
# anything about two genuinely separate kernels.
#
# Usage: see README.md in this directory.

services:
  postgres:
    image: postgres:16-alpine
    environment:
      POSTGRES_USER: postgres
      POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres
      POSTGRES_DB: rootnode_platform_sim
    ports:
      - "5434:5432"
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U postgres"]
      interval: 5s
      timeout: 3s
      retries: 10

  egress-proxy:
    build: ../../../platform/egress-proxy
    network_mode: host

  provisioner:
    build: ../../../platform/provisioner
    network_mode: host
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
      - NET_RAW
    volumes:
      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
      # run-simulation.sh generates this with the real routing_mode: router / router_endpoint
      # once it knows sim-platform-net's actual gateway IP — overrides just this one file, the
      # image's own resource-policy.yaml underneath is untouched.
      - ${SIM_LAB_HOSTS_SEED:?set by run-simulation.sh}:/app/config/lab-hosts.seed.yaml:ro
    environment:
      PLATFORM_DB_URL: postgres://postgres:postgres@localhost:5434/rootnode_platform_sim
      PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET: ${PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET:?set a real secret, do not use a default}
      PROVISIONER_PORT: "4101"
      LAB_IMAGE_REF: ${LAB_IMAGE_REF:-rootnode-academy:test}
      EGRESS_PROXY_PORT: "3128"
      DNS_RESOLVER: "127.0.0.11"
      NO_PROXY_CIDRS: "10.42.0.0/16,10.43.0.0/16"
    depends_on:
      postgres:
        condition: service_healthy

  api:
    build:
      context: ../../..
      dockerfile: platform/api/Dockerfile
    network_mode: host
    environment:
      PLATFORM_DB_URL: postgres://postgres:postgres@localhost:5434/rootnode_platform_sim
      PROVISIONER_URL: "http://localhost:4101"
      PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET: ${PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET:?set a real secret, do not use a default}
      PLATFORM_API_PORT: "4301"
    depends_on:
      postgres:
        condition: service_healthy
      provisioner:
        condition: service_started

  # Simulates rn-platform-01's Gateway — deliberately NOT host-networked, deliberately not
  # attached to any Lab bridge network. This is the isolation under test.
  gateway:
    build: ../../../platform/gateway
    networks:
      - sim-platform-net
    environment:
      GATEWAY_PORT: "4200"
      # Reaches host-networked Provisioner/API via sim-platform-net's own gateway IP — the
      # same "reachable via the bridge's gateway interface" mechanism egress-proxy already
      # relies on (see docker-compose.dev.yml). run-simulation.sh fills these in.
      PROVISIONER_URL: ${SIM_PROVISIONER_URL:?set by run-simulation.sh}
      PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET: ${PROVISIONER_SHARED_SECRET:?set a real secret, do not use a default}
      PLATFORM_API_URL: ${SIM_PLATFORM_API_URL:?set by run-simulation.sh}
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_CA: /tls/ca.pem
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_CERT: /tls/gateway-client-cert.pem
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_KEY: /tls/gateway-client-key.pem
    volumes:
      - ${SIM_TLS_DIR:?set by run-simulation.sh}:/tls:ro
    ports:
      - "4210:4200" # exposed to the test driver script only, not "public" in any real sense
    depends_on:
      - provisioner
      - api

  # Simulates rn-lab-host-01's Lab Host Router — host-networked like egress-proxy, for the same
  # reason (needs to reach whatever per-Lab bridge networks the Provisioner creates, which are
  # not known/attachable ahead of time).
  lab-router:
    build: ../../../platform/lab-router
    network_mode: host
    environment:
      LAB_ROUTER_PORT: "8443"
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_CA: /tls/ca.pem
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_CERT: /tls/router-server-cert.pem
      LAB_ROUTER_TLS_KEY: /tls/router-server-key.pem
      DOCKER_SOCKET: /var/run/docker.sock
    volumes:
      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
      - ${SIM_TLS_DIR:?set by run-simulation.sh}:/tls:ro

networks:
  # Pre-created by run-simulation.sh (so it can inspect the real gateway IP BEFORE any
  # container starts and hand it to provisioner/gateway/lab-router as config) — Compose is
  # told to use that existing network rather than create its own.
  sim-platform-net:
    external: true
    name: ${COMPOSE_NET_NAME:?set by run-simulation.sh}